As a part of its structure, Massachusetts has a flat-rate revenue tax. Since 2020, that fee has been 5.0 p.c and was really larger in some earlier years. Numerous curiosity teams have tried over time to alter the structure in order that the state authorities might impose the next revenue tax fee on high-income individuals. Different individuals efficiently and valiantly succeeded in combating off these makes an attempt.
This month, there was, but once more, a measure on the Massachusetts poll to alter the structure and impose the next tax fee on individuals with excessive incomes. Particularly, the measure referred to as for a 4-percentage level surtax on the portion of individuals’s revenue in extra of $1 million. I had hoped to report that this measure failed.
Alas, I can not. With 99 p.c of the votes counted, 52.0 p.c voted Sure, with 48.0 p.c voting No. That signifies that it’s mathematically unimaginable for the measure to be voted down. If each single remaining vote have been a No, that may imply that 51.5 p.c are Sure votes and 48.5 p.c are No votes.
These are the opening paragraphs of my “The Unhealthy Information from Taxachusetts,” IPI, TaxBytes, November 16, 2022.
And the final paragraph:
The requirement that everybody pay the identical tax fee on revenue restrained politicians from elevating the tax fee considerably as a result of they knew it might hit everybody. Certainly, generally that constraint led politicians to really minimize Massachusetts’ revenue tax charges. In 1992, for instance, the tax fee was 5.95 p.c. It fell in steps to five.0 p.c. Sadly, the constraint that led to that joyful result’s now gone.
Learn the entire thing, which is sort of brief.
