Again in April, my typically co-author and buddy Charley Hooper was requested to testify on Zoom in entrance of a residents’ fee in Canada that was investigating varied responses to Covid-19.
Right here is the hyperlink to the Frontier Centre’s publish on his testimony. You’ll be able to then click on on the hyperlink there to look at his testimony (or click on on this hyperlink.)
Some highlights observe.
4:00: The mismatch.
5:50: The controversy over ivermectin.
8:20: When varied medicine have been out there to take care of Covid-19.
9:00: Historical past of ivermectin.
10:40: Medication used for illness A typically work with illness B.
11:30: Ivermectin kills a number of viruses.
11:58: Does it work?
12:10: Merck and FDA assault ivermectin.
14:00: FDA claimed that ivermectin will not be an anti-viral.
15:00: FDA’s motives: EUA, off-label utilization
17:40: Merck’s motives
18:50: Discover the host’s query.
20:30: The TOGETHER trial.
24:00: The opposite research, a lot of which discovered advantages.
26:00: Host’s query about early remedy.
27:25: A fundamental precept with treating viruses is to deal with early.
28:00: Different medicine not nearly as good and a few have severe uncomfortable side effects, resembling acute kidney failure and hurt to DNA.
29:50: Statistical significance.
31:00: Outcomes versus narrative. “Solely” 91.2% certain or 93% certain.
34:00: How ridiculous this might be.
35:30: Conclusion: In pandemic strive medicine off the shelf.
39:30: How may this be achieved higher? Eliminate FDA censorship: permit drug firms to earn a living (a bit of slim on particulars right here) after patent has expired.
45:30: Repeal efficacy requirement.
