Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Russian politics myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
In December 2003, Russia held parliamentary elections and Vladimir Putin’s United Russia celebration plastered Moscow with marketing campaign posters. They displayed the nationwide flag, a bear, the slogan “a robust Russia is a united Russia” and a map depicting 145 figures from Russian historical past — one, it was stated, for each million of the nation’s inhabitants.
This week, on the twenty fifth anniversary of Putin’s first presidential victory, neither Russians nor westerners can say they weren’t forewarned. For the map advised a model of historical past near the previous KGB agent’s coronary heart: Russia is robust when the state is robust; it’s a messianic nice energy with distinctive qualities; and the precondition of greatness is that home opponents and subversive foreigners should be neutralised to maintain Russia united behind its chief.
The posters confirmed Alexander Nevsky, a medieval warrior prince now celebrated in state-sponsored historic theme parks throughout the nation for resisting western aggressors. They confirmed Peter the Nice, the tsar who expanded Russia’s frontiers and strengthened the state. They even confirmed Joseph Stalin — not a Russian, however a Georgian tyrant esteemed within the Putin period for annihilating invaders and guaranteeing the Soviet Union was feared and revered overseas.
Putin has not but achieved his elementary battle goals in Ukraine — the discount of Ukrainian independence to a cipher, and the discrediting of a Ukrainian identification distinct from that of Russia. Courtesy of Donald Trump, he might accomplish that. However we must also think about what that may imply for the Russian folks, and for the liberties they’re denied now and have loved solely briefly spurts down the centuries.
If talks with the US produce an end result that Putin can painting as a victory in Ukraine, it could deal a blow to Russians who hope for much less political repression and a much less militarised ambiance in public life. Solely a minority oppose the battle. Many extra help it, and nonetheless others have saved their heads right down to keep away from bother with the authorities. However all know Putin would interpret a triumph in Ukraine as a vindication of his authoritarian rule.
Putin may even recall Catherine the Nice’s touch upon autocracy: “Some other type of authorities could be not merely dangerous, however completely ruinous for Russia.” However the 18th-century empress just isn’t amongst Putin’s favorite historic personalities. She corresponded with Voltaire, the French thinker. Putin chats with Tucker Carlson.
Repression underneath Putin just isn’t on the ranges of Stalin’s dictatorship, when tens of millions had been in labour camps. Impartial Russian and western specialists estimate there are a minimum of 1,500 political prisoners. However for each Galina Starovoitova, Boris Nemtsov and Alexei Navalny, who paid with their lives for opposing Putin, there are quite a few much less well-known persecuted Russians.
Young and old alike fall into Putin’s internet. This month, a navy court docket sentenced Soviet-era dissident Alexander Skobov, 67, to 16 years in a maximum-security jail for criticising the assault on Ukraine. In November, Arseny Turbin, who was solely 15 when arrested in 2023 for opposing the battle, misplaced an enchantment in opposition to a five-year jail time period.
The crackdown on dissent blends with Putin’s sense of imperial mission in Ukraine. Zbigniew Brzezinski, a former US nationwide safety adviser, as soon as noticed: “With out Ukraine, Russia ceases to be an empire, however with Ukraine suborned after which subordinated, Russia routinely turns into an empire.” It was a useful perception, however the implications for inner circumstances are much more profound.
To attain glory, Russia’s empire builders have invariably felt it essential to subjugate society to the state and hound nonconformists branded as threats to nationwide unity. This was true of Ivan the Horrible, a fearsome tsar who conquered the khanates of Kazan and Astrakhan, paving the best way for Russian growth in direction of the Caspian Sea and Siberia. 4 centuries later, Stalin constructed a de facto empire in jap Europe whereas imitating the despotism of Ivan, whom he vastly admired.
Now the identical sample is unfolding in Putin’s Russia. In his eyes, liberalisation at house — as underneath Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin — went hand in hand with the lack of empire and degradation of Moscow’s standing on this planet. Conversely, home repression offers him a free hand to pursue mastery over Ukraine and even a restored sphere of affect in jap Europe.
Victory within the battle would subsequently delay the following flip within the cycle of Russian historical past, in keeping with which repression and a minimum of partial freedom observe one another like adjustments within the seasons. Vladimir Lenin’s Pink Terror gave solution to the New Financial Coverage. Then got here Stalin, and after him the thaw underneath Nikita Khrushchev. Circumstances tightened underneath Leonid Brezhnev and his successors, however Gorbachev and Yeltsin modified all that. Now we have now Putin.
Is it conceivable that the following Kremlin chief will type a part of this sample, liberalising at house whereas pursuing a much less bellicose international coverage? To a big extent, the reply relies on the battle’s end result. If Putin’s successor inherits management of Ukraine with an expanded space of affect in Europe, and needs to maintain it that manner, then the flip of the cycle in direction of home reform could also be delayed even longer. The lesson of Russia’s previous, and of Putin’s rule, is that an imperial mentality is incompatible with freedom for the Russian folks.
